SOME CLARIFICATIONS ABOUT DIFFERENT FORMS OF CHRISTIANITY
Letโs start with the more extreme forms of conservative Protestantism, FUNDAMENTALISM and Pentecostalism. The first got its name from the publication of a series of paperback books called โThe Fundamentalsโ (around 1900), which on the surface seemed to reinforce the most conservative Christian beliefs. In fact, several of these authors were not as conservative as the others, but not many folks noticed. Chief among these basic beliefs were (and are) 1. the inerrancy of the original texts of the Bible (which no one has actually seen) as presented in the King James translation, 2. the full Divinity of Jesus Christ, 3. the Trinitarian nature of God, and 4. the Final triumph of Godโs rule, with sinners going to hell and Believers going to Heaven, everlastingly.
Pentecostalists often also profess these same fundamentalist beliefs, but for the most part they do not focus much on drawing fine doctrinal distinctions. Their emphasis is on the Life of the Holy Spirit, especially in active, free worship, often including speaking in tongues and the healing of both bodily and spiritual infirmities. There are a few types of โdenominationalโ groups, often called โHolinessโ churches, and a great many Independent churches. Right next to these groups, one could also place Mormons (Latter Day Saints) and Seventh Day Adventists, each with its own โspecialโ divergences from traditional Christian beliefs.
At the opposite end of the continuum stand LIBERAL churches, a modern movement that arose around the same time as Fundamentalism but rejected the more traditional stance, with an increasing number of believers who did not take the Bible โliterallyโ and sought an interpretation that better fit modern scientific and theological thought. Methodists, Presbyterians, Episcopalians, and Baptists, by and large, moved in this direction, seeking not to take the Bible literally and to embrace modern cultural norms. Most American Christians would fall into this category. Beginning around 1950, a movement toward a โNeo-Orthodoxโ Christianity emerged that seeks to stand between these two approaches, as well as an โEvangelicalโ form of Protestantism that seeks to be faithful to the main emphases of the Christian Faith without being overly โdoctrinaireโ. Many such churches exist within the structure of nearly every denomination today.
Throughout, the Roman Catholic Church stands, having undergone many changes in doctrine and emphasis in recent years, reflecting its own developments during the 20th Century, especially through the Vatican Councils and the ecumenical and World Council of Churches movements. Many, perhaps most, Catholic Churches are doctrinally rather traditional, yet politically โradical.โ In my own experience, I have been mostly Protestant, sometimes Catholic, and largely liberal in doctrine and social action. Theological Seminaries also vary widely, with both mainline and independent ones being quite diverse. My emphasis is on solid Biblical scholarship and strong socio/political action.
In recent years, Mari and I have grown tired of almost all โtraditionalโ churches and have yet to find another that carries genuine Christian roots with โmodernโ emphases. If you go โlooking,โ you will find a whole host of more or less โtraditionalโ denominations and/or congregations. You might be surprised to learn that many โoff-the-main-lineโ Christian groups are available. Hereโs just a beginning list of church groups that take a less traditional approach to historical Christianity than the โmain-linersโ:
SPLINTER GROUPS OFF OF TRADITIONAL PROTESTANT CHRISTIANITY
Southern Baptists
Free Methodists
Nazarene Christianity
Amish Christianity
Mennonite Christianity
Quaker Christianity
Freewill Baptists
Plymouth Brethren
Pentecostal Christianity
Seventh-day Adventist
Latter-day Saints
Fundamental Churches of America
African Methodist
Leave a Reply